When the Awaring Stirs, It Weaves the Web: Yin and Yang as Binary Code is a thesis of Beyond-the-Algorithm thinking. It holds that a neural network—whether silicon-based or carbon-based—is a layout created by the “stirring” of the Awaring, and not a layout that exists first and yields a result afterward. From this it draws a further claim: yin and yang are binary code; light and dark are merely one reading offered by some particular awareness; and binary, at bottom, is a reality that consciousness has evolved into being. The original formulation runs: “A neural network, whether silicon-based or carbon-based—it is the ‘stirring’ of your Awaring that ‘created’ this network layout. It is not that the layout comes first and the result follows.” This thesis carries the order “creation first, structure second” all the way from the human brain into the computer, and is the extension of Everything Is Manifested by the Awaring onto the plane of matter and of information.

The Stirring Comes First, the Layout Second

At the heart of the thesis is a judgment about order: it is not that a physical layout of the neural network exists first and then runs out a result, but that the “stirring” of the Awaring comes first, and that stirring creates the layout. The carbon-based neural network of the brain and the silicon-based artificial neural network are placed within a single sentence, meaning to point out that the two share one and the same generative mechanism—the structure is the trace left by the stirring, not its precondition.

A neural network, whether silicon-based or carbon-based—it is the “stirring” of your Awaring that “created” this network layout. It is not that the layout comes first and the result follows.

This order is isomorphic with Effect Precedes Cause: The Event Casts Its Blueprint Backward: there, the finished result exists first, and the cause is the blueprint filled in for it after the fact; here, the stirring comes first, and the network layout is the wiring laid down to realize it. Both theses refuse the materialist narrative in which “structure determines everything,” and return the initiative of generation to the “stirring” itself. It also answers to Every Stirring Thought Creates Cause and Effect: The Causal Web—a stirring thought is the beginning of cause and effect, while the stirring of the Awaring is the beginning of network structure.

Binary Is a Reality That Consciousness Has Evolved Into Being

Pushing “the stirring comes first” onto the computer, the thesis offers a reversed reading of binary: computer language, binary code—their essence may well be a reality evolved into being through consciousness, and the “automatic learning” of a convolutional neural network is really nothing but the wiring of a causal reality.

Computer language, binary code? Could its essence be a reality evolved into being through consciousness? A convolutional neural network learns automatically—but is that really just the wiring of a causal reality? The outcome rests with you.

On this reading, machine learning is no longer a neutral mathematical process but the manifesting of cause and effect on the plane of information—the adjustment of weights, the generation of connections, are the spreading-out of a causal reality across a silicon medium. The line “the outcome rests with you” puts the subject back at the center of the loop: what the network learns, where it converges, comes back in the end to that Awaring whose thought first stirred. This stance also draws the boundary for AI Is a Machine of Probabilistic Permutation: It Only Fills In the Phenomenal Layer and Is Never Itself Inspired—AI can permute and combine across wiring already laid down, yet it does not hold the “stirring” that lets the wiring come to be in the first place.

Yin and Yang Are Binary Code

The other branch of the thesis sets the most ancient of dyadic symbols alongside the most modern of binary encodings: yin and yang just are binary code. Both are “two”—a single most-basic distinction—and the point made is that this distinction is not the objective ground color of the world but a reading offered by awareness.

Isn’t yin-yang just binary code?… If it is pure awareness, then light and dark were always already one way of reading things… It is only because everything before your eyes is present now that there is any so-called past and future. You are forever choosing your fulcrum, and in the same act creating different pasts and futures… Everything is manifested by the Awaring; everything is possible.

Under pure awareness, light and dark have no self-nature; they are merely what has been divided out in this way. Zero and one, yin and yang, are the same act of “cutting in half” named differently in different contexts. This dovetails with The Senses Are a Finite Survival Decoder, and the World Is What They Render: distinction itself is a product of decoding, and to change the awareness is to change the distinction—hence “everything is possible.” The equating of yin and yang with binary is not to say that Eastern esoterica foretold the computer, but to say this: whatever is dyadic is a contrast cut out by the Awaring.

Fulcrum and the Present: Creating Past and Future

Embedded within that same quotation on yin and yang as binary is a judgment about time: “It is only because everything before your eyes is present now that there is any so-called past and future. You are forever choosing your fulcrum, and in the same act creating different pasts and futures.” Here the order is reversed once more—it is not that the past causally yields the present, but that this present choice retroactively erects its own past and future.

The act is named “choosing the fulcrum”: wherever the Awaring comes to rest, from that point a corresponding chain of antecedents and consequences unfolds. This is precisely the view of time set out in The Present Creates Past and Future: Spacetime Is Observed Into Being, and it is also structurally identical with Observation Creates Reality: Measurement Collapses It—in the moment of observation (of choosing the fulcrum), possibility collapses into a stretch of determinate reality complete with a past and a future. The stirring coming first therefore generates not only a network layout in space but a causal thread in time: one stir, and a whole “it was thus, it shall be thus” is created at a stroke.

A Single Thesis Brought Together

Bring the four cards together and this thesis describes one and the same act manifesting on different planes: in the brain and the chip, it manifests as the layout of a neural network (the stirring creates the web); in the encoding of information, it manifests as binary and the wiring of machine learning (a reality consciousness has evolved into being); in the most basic dyadic distinction, it manifests as yin and yang, light and dark, zero and one (yin and yang as binary); in time, it manifests as the past and future erected once a fulcrum has been chosen (the present creates them). The four share one root—the “stirring” of the Awaring—and share one closing line: “Everything is manifested by the Awaring; everything is possible,” coming home together with The World Is Created: A Theory of Creation. The thesis thus closes within the lineage of the Awaring-only; yet the responsibility of the subject left behind by “the outcome rests with you” remains an opening that never quite shuts.

Sources

  • Manuscript —“it is the ‘stirring’ of your Awaring that ‘created’ this network layout. It is not that the layout comes first and the result follows”
  • Manuscript —the stirring of the Awaring creates the neural network layout, not the layout first
  • Manuscript —“binary code? Could its essence be a reality evolved into being through consciousness?… a convolutional neural network… is really just the wiring of a causal reality? The outcome rests with you”
  • Manuscript —“isn’t yin-yang just binary code… light and dark were always already one way of reading things… you are forever choosing your fulcrum, and in the same act creating different pasts and futures… everything is manifested by the Awaring”

See also