Awaring-force is a core thesis within the Awaring, awakening, and the methods of practice. It names that inner drive and directed energy — the sheer “what do I want to do” — that sets a human apart both from the calculations of the brain and from artificial intelligence. The thesis carries two layers. In the theory of practice: the brain “strikes back,” and one must set Awaring-force against it so as not to be led around by instinct and memory. In the theory of value: once machinery has taken over physical labor and AI has taken over mental labor, the one thing in a human being that can never be replaced — and is therefore worth the most — is precisely this purpose-bearing Awaring-force. “Every company of that kind, in the future, will become a manufacturer of this Awaring-force.”

The Brain Strikes Back

The thesis begins by positing the brain as something to be reckoned with, not as a master to be trusted by default. Here enters the notion of “the brain’s counterattack”: the brain has its own operational inertia and will, by way of instinct, memory, and calculation, turn around and hold a person hostage — and Awaring-force is what one must set against it. The opposition condenses into a shorthand:

The brain strikes back. Awaring-force vs. the brain. A reflection on the structure of plants and animals.

Setting “the structure of plants and animals” alongside this is meant to press a question: is the brain a tool in the service of the human, or has it already made the human into its carrier? Awaring-force against the brain is therefore not the suppression of thought but the reclaiming of command — letting directed intention, rather than automatic neural reaction, decide where one goes. This opposition shares a root with Cognition Constructs Reality: Both Danger and Role Are Set by the Mind: if you let the brain react on autopilot, you live inside the dangers and roles it weaves for you; only by meeting it with Awaring-force can there be any talk of redefinition.

Hypnosis Is Self-Suggestion

How Awaring-force acts upon the brain comes down to one concrete mechanism: “hypnosis” — stripped here of its mystical setting and restored to a pure self-instruction:

Hypnosis = self-suggestion = giving instructions to oneself … All suffering is, in essence, a kind of memory. Suffering, at bottom, is a self-interested phenomenon; self-interest is instinct, and it is correct.

Within this frame, hypnosis is not being manipulated by another but the process of issuing instructions to oneself and rewriting one’s default reactions. Two judgments serve as its bedrock support. First, the essence of suffering is memory — and since it is memory, it can be overwritten by a new experience. Second, self-interest is instinct, and it is “correct” — where “correct” refers to its accuracy as a fact of biological instinct, not to any moral praise. To grant that suffering is memory and self-interest is instinct is precisely to avoid wrestling with them head-on, and instead to rewrite them with suggestion, a higher-order means. The view that suffering, being memory, can be rewritten is of a piece with Suffering Is the Tempering of the Soul: suffering is both the raw material of the tempering and an object that Awaring-force can transmute.

Nerve Cells Recognize Only Experience

For self-suggestion to truly rewrite the brain, what does the work is not the repeated reciting of words but repetition charged with genuine feeling. The operable mechanism:

Repetition + genuine feeling = a new groove takes form (nerve cells recognize only experience, not language) … In the entered state, a suggestion is dozens of times more potent than in ordinary life.

This brings the earlier “hypnosis = self-suggestion” down to the physiological layer: rewriting the subconscious depends on the physical reshaping of neural pathways (“a new groove takes form”), and nerve cells do not register abstract language — they register only experience taken as real. Hollow slogans are therefore useless; the suggestion must be accompanied by real emotion and bodily sensation. And in the “entered state” — that is, a state of highly gathered attention, akin to meditation — the same suggestion is amplified dozens of times over. This is exactly the point of application where Awaring-force meets the brain: choose the right state, pour in genuine feeling, and you can carve intention into the hardware. The method belongs to the same operational system as Counting the Crystal Ball: Place Your Power on Clarity (A Method of Meditation) — the former governs “placing your power on clarity,” the latter “carving intention into the nerves.”

Finding an Opening Beyond the Algorithm

Shifting the gaze from individual practice to the predicament of the age of AI, the other face of Awaring-force surfaces: it is the one foothold on which a person can stand firm amid the flood of algorithms. The judgment on one’s own relationship to AI:

AI will only get faster, it is hard to keep up with on the professional side, and I am no master of traffic either. So the only way is to find an opening beyond the algorithm — neither bound by AI nor failing to use it to bring my own strengths into play.

“Beyond the algorithm” is the key phrase. It concedes that on the tracks where algorithms excel — speed, expertise, traffic — a head-on contest is a losing one, and so it argues for a change of dimension: go find the openings the algorithm cannot reach, so as to be neither bound by it nor unable, in turn, to press it into service. This is the same posture as The Resonance Dividend of Mere Technique Is Running Out: Consume the Algorithm, Don’t Be Consumed by It — be the consumer of the algorithm, not the one consumed; and it answers to AI Is a Machine of Probabilistic Permutation: It Only Fills In the Phenomenal Layer and Is Never Itself Inspired — AI can only permute and combine within the phenomenal layer, and that opening beyond the algorithm falls precisely where AI cannot fill in.

Awaring-Force Is the Human Being’s Final Value

Why is the opening beyond the algorithm, of all things, Awaring-force? Because once both physical and mental power approach the infinite, the one variable a human has left is “purpose.” The thesis receives its fullest statement here:

AI has no purpose, whereas a human is all purpose. The human’s purpose is Awaring-force. Once physical power and mental power both approach the infinite, the most important question is: you — what do you want to do? … Pour in Awaring-force, alongside physical and mental power. Become a new kind of human.

Machinery amplifies physical power, AI amplifies mental power, and both will press toward the infinite and so be leveled flat; the one thing AI does not have is “what do you want to do” — it is without purpose, while the human is all purpose. The center of gravity of value thus shifts from capability to intention, from “can you do it” to “do you want to, and what do you want to do.” This is the two faces of one and the same inversion shared with The Great Inversion of Value: AI Levels Cleverness, and Causality, Kindness, Wisdom, Faith, and Philosophy Become Worth the Most: once cleverness has been smoothed away, what floats to the surface is exactly what AI cannot hold — and Awaring-force is among the most direct of these. It also answers the question left open by AI Cannot Awaken: Meditation Is the One Thing AI Can Never Replace — what AI cannot replace is not only awakening, but this purpose-bearing Awaring-force as well.

The Manufacturer of Awaring-Force

Finally, the thesis pushes individual value out into a judgment about industry: Awaring-force is not only the individual’s talisman but the core output of a future industry. The claim:

Following on from what I just said — that “Awaring-force” he defined as the most valuable thing — every company of that kind will become a manufacturer of this “Awaring-force.”

Here we take the intellectual kernel rather than the business mechanics: once capability has been made universal by AI and tends toward the infinite, what is truly scarce, and therefore worth the most, is the capacity to supply “purpose and directed intention” — to spark, carry, and amplify a human being’s Awaring-force. An organization that can do this is, in essence, “a manufacturer of Awaring-force.” This judgment echoes Autonomy and Evolution: The Brain-Computer Interface Surrenders Your Choice, and One Must Reshape the Genes Through the Subconscious to Stand Against AI: holding onto, and actively reshaping, the subconscious in the age of AI — not surrendering one’s power of choice — is the very precondition for Awaring-force to be manufactured and preserved at all. Awaring-force is at once the inner energy by which the individual stands against the brain and against the algorithm, and the hard currency that finally settles out after an age has inverted its values.

Sources

  • Manuscript — “Hypnosis = self-suggestion = giving instructions to oneself … All suffering is, in essence, a kind of memory … Self-interest is instinct, and it is correct.”
  • Manuscript — “The brain strikes back. Awaring-force vs. the brain. A reflection on the structure of plants and animals.”
  • Manuscript — “The only way is to find an opening beyond the algorithm, neither bound by AI nor failing to use it … Every company of that kind will become a manufacturer of this ‘Awaring-force.‘”
  • Manuscript — “AI has no purpose, whereas a human is all purpose … Once physical power and mental power both approach the infinite, the most important question is: you — what do you want to do? … Become a new kind of human.”
  • Manuscript — “Repetition + genuine feeling = a new groove takes form (nerve cells recognize only experience, not language) … In the entered state, a suggestion is dozens of times more potent than in ordinary life.”

See also